|
(第
1
篇)
cc
於 2013/10/3 上午 09:09:00
說： |
窮人說這個沒用 帝寶就算跌到一坪50萬 窮人還是買不起
|
|
|
(第
2
篇)
Coca
於 2013/10/3 上午 09:10:00
說： |
又不是多貴 怎麼買不起
有能力就拉高啊 怎麼會拉不高
|
|
|
(第
3
篇)
fab
於 2013/10/3 上午 09:11:00
說： |
土人島的寓話
在一島有兩部族、人口99%是「土人」及1%是「賢者」
Let's say that on an island there are two tribes. Ninety-nine percent of the population are the "Bushes" and 1% are the "Smartos.
在土人中有若干聰明的人、同樣被獎勵蓄積財富。但、彼必須支付漸漸上昇的高價格取得島的資產因為島的大部分資產 被賢者及土人中上流人士所有、因為彼的財富、實際上無賣卻資產的必要製度中的龜裂開始出現、因為越多財富集中於越少的手中
Among the Bushes there were also some smart people, and they were encouraged to accumulate wealth as well. However, they had to pay an increasingly high price to acquire assets, since most of the island's assets were owned by the Smartos and by the elite of the Bushes who, because of their wealth, never really had to sell any assets. Cracks in the system began to appear because more and more of the wealth began to be increasingly concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.
但、賢者偶然發見別的富之道: 國際化。此島、在開放外國貿易及投資之後、許允經營者將生產移往低費用的海外、同時、通過價格收縮的消費物品之輸入、使土人部族中大眾滿足
However, the Smartos then stumbled upon another avenue to wealth: globalization. The island was opened to foreign trade and investments, which allowed the business owners to shift their production to low-cost foreign countries and, at the same time, to keep the masses among the Bush tribe happy through the imports of price-deflating consumer goods.
今、賢者及土人中上流人士將低價輸入品、既供給被彼制御及從以上獲得可觀的利益、交換資產之結果、土人的人口之大半經驗比較賢者相對的富之減少
now the Smartos and the elite of the Bushes exchanged cheap imported goods, whose supply they controlled and from which they earned handsome margins, for assets. As a result, the majority of the population of the Bushes experienced a relative wealth decline compared to the wealth of the Smartos.
又、短時間內以上的機能是完璧的: 大眾滿足於購入收縮的消費物品、但默視、因為製造業的仕事及交易可能的服務漸漸移向海外、賃金及給與實質上減少的事實。長時間內以上非問題、因為賢者已購入島的中央銀行。確保體制有利用可能之充分的資金以維持被膨張的資產價格驅動的。過度消費豐富的流動資產及資產價格的上昇在土人中作成「富之錯覺」
Again, this worked perfectly well for a while: the populace was happy to buy deflating consumer goods but it overlooked the fact that its wages and salaries were decreasing in real terms because manufacturing jobs and tradable services were increasingly shifting overseas. For some time this wasn't a problem, because the Smartos had bought the island's central bank. They made sure that sufficient money was made available to the system to sustain the consumption binge, which was largely driven by inflating asset prices. Plenty of liquidity and rising asset prices created among the Bushes the "illusion of wealth."
但、在創造追加的富上決不困惑、賢者編出又一自肥的方案: 對流動資產低的家庭(既高度危險融資)的融資。賢者不貸自身的金錢給予無信用貸價值的人(彼太俐巧); 為了肥滿的報酬、彼配置及獎勵此資金調達的新方式。信用貸、消費者、及住宅貸款的債務全部被精查及賣卻給年金基金及資產信用會社、既佔人口99%土人是大部分的受益者
But never at a loss when it came to creating additional wealth, the Smartos devised another scheme to enrich themselves even further: lending to illiquid households (read sub-prime lending). Not that the Smartos would have lent their own money to these uncreditworthy individuals (they were far too clever for that); for a fat fee, they arranged and encouraged this novel type of financing. Credit card, consumer, and mortgage debts were all securitized and sold to pension funds and asset management companies whose beneficiaries were the majority of Bushes, who accounted, as indicated above, for 99% of the population.
~Marc Faber IRREPARABLE CRACKS IN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM『金融制度內不可取返的龜裂』
|
|
|
(第
4
篇)
乖
於 2013/10/3 上午 09:14:00
說： |
服貿通過再漲三成 不要眼紅喔
|
|
|
(第
5
篇)
AA
於 2013/10/3 上午 09:17:00
說： |
ECFA通過後經濟成長率6%
你賺到了嗎
|
|
|
(第
6
篇)
to5f
於 2013/10/3 上午 09:26:00
說： |
不是9.2%嗎
|
|
|
(第
7
篇)
Coca
於 2015/10/13 上午 12:45:00
說： |
炒樓王 玩不動
被烏鴉COCA 點名說要變初跌段
不幸言中
|
|
|
(第
8
篇)
Coca
於 2015/10/27 下午 10:20:00
說： |
房仲業 真的是溫室的花朵
被政府保護太久了
開太多間 本來市場機制就是會倒
整天怪東怪西
|
|
|
(第
9
篇)
Coca
於 2017/2/21 下午 11:34:00
說： |
早就說了，帝寶不是不會跌
2017年02月15日21:27
"史上第二宗帝寶法拍戶今日二拍，位於E棟13樓，底價2億6480萬元，雖已較一拍底價打了8折，不過今日拍賣現場冷清，最終無人投標，三拍底價將下殺2億1184萬"
行情都不會看，就不要跟人家學做房地產，真的很low
|
|